Fix schema compare exclude behaviour (#884)

* Send back dependencies causing the exclude to fail instead of blocking the call

* Separate AffectedDependences and BlockingDependencies into separate properties

* add named parameters

* separate out include/exclude success cases for clarity
This commit is contained in:
Kim Santiago
2019-10-25 18:01:33 -07:00
committed by GitHub
parent 57b7126ccf
commit b9faabb704
4 changed files with 44 additions and 29 deletions

View File

@@ -47,6 +47,15 @@ namespace Microsoft.SqlTools.ServiceLayer.SchemaCompare.Contracts
/// </summary>
public class SchemaCompareIncludeExcludeResult : ResultStatus
{
public List<DiffEntry> ChangedDifferences { get; set; }
/// <summary>
/// Dependencies that may have been affected by the include/exclude request
/// </summary>
public List<DiffEntry> AffectedDependencies { get; set; }
/// <summary>
/// Dependencies that caused the include/exclude to fail
/// </summary>
public List<DiffEntry> BlockingDependencies { get; set; }
}
}

View File

@@ -39,7 +39,9 @@ namespace Microsoft.SqlTools.ServiceLayer.SchemaCompare
public bool Success { get; set; }
public List<DiffEntry> ChangedDifferences;
public List<DiffEntry> AffectedDependencies;
public List<DiffEntry> BlockingDependencies;
public SchemaCompareIncludeExcludeNodeOperation(SchemaCompareNodeParams parameters, SchemaComparisonResult comparisonResult)
{
@@ -66,26 +68,29 @@ namespace Microsoft.SqlTools.ServiceLayer.SchemaCompare
throw new InvalidOperationException(SR.SchemaCompareExcludeIncludeNodeNotFound);
}
// Check first if the dependencies will allow this if it's an exclude request
if (!this.Parameters.IncludeRequest)
{
IEnumerable<SchemaDifference> dependencies = this.ComparisonResult.GetExcludeDependencies(node);
bool block = dependencies.Any(d => d.Included);
if (block)
{
this.Success = false;
return;
}
}
this.Success = this.Parameters.IncludeRequest ? this.ComparisonResult.Include(node) : this.ComparisonResult.Exclude(node);
// create list of affected dependencies of this request
if (this.Success)
// if include request (pass or fail), send dependencies that might have been affected by this request, given by GetIncludeDependencies()
if(this.Parameters.IncludeRequest)
{
IEnumerable<SchemaDifference> dependencies = this.ComparisonResult.GetIncludeDependencies(node);
this.ChangedDifferences = dependencies.Select(difference => SchemaCompareUtils.CreateDiffEntry(difference, null)).ToList();
IEnumerable<SchemaDifference> affectedDependencies = this.ComparisonResult.GetIncludeDependencies(node);
this.AffectedDependencies = affectedDependencies.Select(difference => SchemaCompareUtils.CreateDiffEntry(difference: difference, parent: null)).ToList();
}
else
{ // if exclude was successful, the possible affected dependencies are given by GetIncludedDependencies()
if(this.Success)
{
IEnumerable<SchemaDifference> affectedDependencies = this.ComparisonResult.GetIncludeDependencies(node);
this.AffectedDependencies = affectedDependencies.Select(difference => SchemaCompareUtils.CreateDiffEntry(difference: difference, parent: null)).ToList();
}
// if not successful, send back the exclude dependencies that caused it to fail
else
{
IEnumerable<SchemaDifference> blockingDependencies = this.ComparisonResult.GetExcludeDependencies(node);
blockingDependencies = blockingDependencies.Where(difference => difference.Included == node.Included);
this.BlockingDependencies = blockingDependencies.Select(difference => SchemaCompareUtils.CreateDiffEntry(difference: difference, parent: null)).ToList();
}
}
}
catch (Exception e)

View File

@@ -255,7 +255,8 @@ namespace Microsoft.SqlTools.ServiceLayer.SchemaCompare
{
Success = operation.Success,
ErrorMessage = operation.ErrorMessage,
ChangedDifferences = operation.ChangedDifferences
AffectedDependencies = operation.AffectedDependencies,
BlockingDependencies = operation.BlockingDependencies
});
}
catch (Exception e)

View File

@@ -864,8 +864,10 @@ WITH VALUES
t2ExcludeOperation.Execute(TaskExecutionMode.Execute);
Assert.False(t2ExcludeOperation.Success, "Excluding Table t2 should fail because view v1 depends on it");
Assert.True(t2ExcludeOperation.ComparisonResult.Differences.Where(x => x.SourceObject != null && x.SourceObject.Name.Parts[1] == "t2").First().Included, "Difference Table t2 should still be included because the exclude request failed");
Assert.True(t2ExcludeOperation.BlockingDependencies.Count == 1, "There should be one dependency");
Assert.True(t2ExcludeOperation.BlockingDependencies[0].SourceValue[1] == "v1", "Dependency should be View v1");
// exclude view first, then excluding t2 should work
// exclude view v1, then t2 should also get excluded by this
DiffEntry v1Diff = SchemaCompareUtils.CreateDiffEntry(schemaCompareOperation.ComparisonResult.Differences.Where(x => x.SourceObject != null && x.SourceObject.Name.Parts[1] == "v1").First(), null);
SchemaCompareNodeParams v1ExcludeParams = new SchemaCompareNodeParams()
{
@@ -878,12 +880,10 @@ WITH VALUES
SchemaCompareIncludeExcludeNodeOperation v1ExcludeOperation = new SchemaCompareIncludeExcludeNodeOperation(v1ExcludeParams, schemaCompareOperation.ComparisonResult);
v1ExcludeOperation.Execute(TaskExecutionMode.Execute);
Assert.True(v1ExcludeOperation.Success, "Excluding View v1 should succeed");
Assert.False(t2ExcludeOperation.ComparisonResult.Differences.Where(x => x.SourceObject != null && x.SourceObject.Name.Parts[1] == "v1").First().Included, "Difference View v1 should be excluded");
// try to exclude t2 again and it should succeed this time
t2ExcludeOperation.Execute(TaskExecutionMode.Execute);
Assert.True(t2ExcludeOperation.Success, "Excluding Table t2 should succeed");
Assert.False(t2ExcludeOperation.ComparisonResult.Differences.Where(x => x.SourceObject != null && x.SourceObject.Name.Parts[1] == "t2").First().Included, "Difference Table t2 should still be excluded");
Assert.False(v1ExcludeOperation.ComparisonResult.Differences.Where(x => x.SourceObject != null && x.SourceObject.Name.Parts[1] == "v1").First().Included, "Difference View v1 should be excluded");
Assert.False(v1ExcludeOperation.ComparisonResult.Differences.Where(x => x.SourceObject != null && x.SourceObject.Name.Parts[1] == "t2").First().Included, "Difference Table t2 should be excluded");
Assert.True(v1ExcludeOperation.AffectedDependencies.Count == 1, "There should be one dependency");
Assert.False(v1ExcludeOperation.AffectedDependencies[0].Included, "The dependency Table t2 should be excluded");
// including v1 should also include t2
SchemaCompareNodeParams v1IncludeParams = new SchemaCompareNodeParams()
@@ -899,8 +899,8 @@ WITH VALUES
Assert.True(v1IncludeOperation.Success, "Including v1 should succeed");
Assert.True(v1IncludeOperation.ComparisonResult.Differences.Where(x => x.SourceObject != null && x.SourceObject.Name.Parts[1] == "v1").First().Included, "Difference View v1 should be included");
Assert.True(v1IncludeOperation.ComparisonResult.Differences.Where(x => x.SourceObject != null && x.SourceObject.Name.Parts[1] == "t2").First().Included, "Difference Table t2 should still be included");
Assert.True(v1IncludeOperation.ChangedDifferences != null && v1IncludeOperation.ChangedDifferences.Count == 1, "There should be one difference");
Assert.True(v1IncludeOperation.ChangedDifferences.First().SourceValue[1] == "t2", "The affected difference of including v1 should be t2");
Assert.True(v1IncludeOperation.AffectedDependencies != null && v1IncludeOperation.AffectedDependencies.Count == 1, "There should be one difference");
Assert.True(v1IncludeOperation.AffectedDependencies.First().SourceValue[1] == "t2", "The affected difference of including v1 should be t2");
// cleanup
SchemaCompareTestUtils.VerifyAndCleanup(targetDacpacFilePath);